WORD FORMATION PROCESS OF NEW WORDS ON POPULAR SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the rapid growth of digital communication, social media has become a dynamic space for linguistic innovation, giving rise to new and often viral words. These lexical creations reflect users’ adaptation to the fast-paced and expressive nature of online interaction. This study aims to (1) identify the types of word formation processes used in viral new words circulating on major social media platforms, and (2) explore the implicit meanings embedded in these linguistic forms. Employing a qualitative content analysis approach, data were collected from two widely used platforms, Instagram and TikTok, resulting in a sample of 25 viral new words. The analysis revealed that blending was the most frequently occurring word formation process, appearing in 10 of the 25 cases. Based on Yule’s framework, the study identified seven distinct word formation types: blending (10), coinage (1), compounding (2), clipping (2), acronyms (4), derivation (1), and multiple processes (5). These findings highlight how social media not only influences the structure of language but also shapes the meanings conveyed through it. Many of these newly formed words carry implicit meanings that reflect current social trends, cultural values, and shared online experiences, demonstrating the evolving nature of language in the digital era.
Article Details
Section
Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Bahasa by http://journal.binadarma.ac.id/index.php/binabahasa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Al-Salman, S., & Haider, A. S. (2021). Covid-19 trending neologisms and word formation processes in English. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25(1), 24–42.
Bauer, L. (2017). Compounds and compounding. Cambridge University Press.
Dor, D. (2015). The instruction of imagination: Language as a social communication technology. Oxford University Press.
Evans, V. (2015). The crucible of language: How language and mind create meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2024). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, praxis, umsetzung mit software und künstlicher intelligenz (6th ed.). Beltz Juventa.
Kurniawati, D., & Pratiwi, D. (2020). Relevance theory in discourse analysis on social media. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 45-58.
McCulloch, G. (2019). Because internet: Understanding the new rules of language. Riverhead Books.
Meikle, G. (2016). Social media: Communication, sharing, and visibility. Routledge.
Misbahillah, A. K. N., Jerau, O. C. P., & Indrawati, F. K. (2024). Exploration of the word formation process in online news articles. Lexeme: Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 6(2).
O’Grady, W. (2016). Contemporary linguistic analysis: An introduction. Edited by William O’Grady and John Archibald.
Plag, I. (2018). Word-formation in English (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Tang, C. M. (2015). Selection criteria of social media for university students using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [Master’s thesis, University of Malaya]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Wong, S. J. (2024). How qualitative data is used in psychology.
Yule, G. (2017). The study of language. Cambridge University Press.
Zappavigna, M. (2016). Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images. Visual Communication, 15(3), 271–292